Friday, 21 February 2014

Reader Response (Final Draft)

In “Globalization of Culture Through the Media”, Kraidy (2002) discusses the different perspectives of the responsibility of mass media in the globalization of culture. Kraidy mentions that some argued the cultural imperialism theory, which refers to Western countries influencing the world with the media, was the initial driving force for globalization. After the Cold War, globalization theory evolved, and it is about different cultures coming together due to the mass media. Kraidy feels that the mass media intensifies the hybridization of different cultures that comes together through globalization.

I do agree with Kraidy from his point of view that the mass media intensifies the hybridization of different cultures that comes together through globalization. With the mass media, it intensifies this cultural hybridization we could now search for the recipes of the different traditional food from the different races, or even watch the different television programmes that are in Mandarin, Malay or Tamil. In addition, with globalization, people from around the world become more interconnected to one another. Mass media allows information to be transmitted from one place to another easily. It can be seen from the fact that we can now access to the news of other countries easily. This shows that mass media do helps to intensifies cultural hybridization even across the world.

I find that the hybridization of cultures is highly relevant to Singapore. Singapore does not have her own culture unlike countries like Japan or Korea, where they both have their own cultures that are unique to them. Singapore is a multiracial country. With the hybridization of cultures mainly from the Chinese, Malay, Indian and others, it gives Singapore a unique culture. In addition, Singapore culture was also influenced by the British, as they colonized Singapore in the past, Singapore had thus adopted English as the first language used. This shows that through cultural hybridization, Singapore’s unique culture was created.


However, I feel that Kraidy should give more examples of cultural hybridization in his article. He could talks about how mass media and cultural hybridization led on to the Korean popular music culture dominating the world today instead of only the American music culture in the past. This will gives a comparision of how cultural hybridization influenced the world with mass media.   

Monday, 17 February 2014

Reader Response (Draft 1)

In “Globalization of Culture Through the Media”, Kraidy (2002) discusses the different perspectives of the responsibility of mass media in the globalization of culture. Kraidy mentions that some argued the cultural imperialism theory, which refers to Western countries influencing the world with the media, was the initial driving force for globalization. After the Cold War, globalization theory evolved, and it is about different cultures coming together due to the mass media. Kraidy feels that the mass media intensifies the hybridization of different cultures that comes together through globalization.

I do agree with Kraidy from his point of view that the mass media intensifies the hybridization of different cultures that comes together through globalization. I find that this is highly relevant to Singapore. Singapore does not have her own culture unlike countries like Japan or Korea, where they both have their own cultures that are unique to them. Singapore is a multiracial country; we have different races living together in Singapore. With the hybridization of different cultures mainly from the Chinese, Malay, Indian and others, it gives Singapore a unique culture. In addition, Singapore culture was also influenced by the British, as they colonized Singapore in the past, Singapore had thus adopted English as the first language used. This shows that through cultural hybridization, Singapore’s unique culture was created.

With the mass media, it intensifies this cultural hybridization we could now search for the recipes of the different traditional food from the different races, or even watch the different television programmes that are in Chinese, Malay or Tamil. In addition, with globalization, people from around the world become more interconnected to one another. Mass media allows information to be transmitted from one place to another easily. Today, we can be informed with news of the United States, or other parts of the world with just a click away. This shows that mass media do helps to intensifies cultural hybridization even across the world.

However, I feel that Kraidy should give more examples of cultural hybridization in his article. He could talks about how mass media and cultural hybridization led on to the Korean popular music culture dominating the world today instead of only the American music culture in the past. This will gives a comparision of how cultural hybridization influenced the world with mass media.  


In conclusion, I feel that mass media further strengthen cultural hybridization today.

Thursday, 13 February 2014

Globalization of Culture Through the Media (Summary)



In “Globalization of Culture Through the Media”, Kraidy (2002) discusses the different perspectives of the responsibility of mass media in the globalization of culture. Kraidy mentions that some argued the cultural imperialism theory, which refers to Western countries influencing the world with the media, was the initial driving force for globalization. After the Cold War, globalization theory evolved, and it is about different cultures coming together due to the mass media. Kraidy feels that the mass media creates a hybridization of different cultures through globalization. 

Thursday, 6 February 2014

An event that has shaped my life and the person I have become

My life is not as happening as most people, I did not went through a lot, but this event was kept vividly on my mind since then and it made me to be a better person and who I am today.

I used to be a playful girl in my secondary school days, homework assignments and examinations were never my top priority at that point of time. During secondary 3 and 4, I would always top the class but unfortunately from the bottom. It never occurred to me that that I was not doing well in school and O levels would be a disaster for me. It was only until this Parent-Teacher meeting session that I had during the mid of secondary 4. My form teacher told my parents that I was a bad influence to my friends in class and with the grades that I was obtaining, I would not be able to enter into junior college nor polytechnic. After hearing what my teacher had said, I began studying more intensively. Thankfully, with all the hard work that I had put in, I was able to enter junior college, which I proved the teacher wrong.


After this event, I began to realize the importance of setting goals in my life and I had also changed my attitude towards school and studying. If it wasn’t for what my form teacher said back in secondary school, I would not be able to have such a drastic change and be who I am today. I am truly thankful for her.